Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (341273)	6/26/2007 1:29:30 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578195

Justices Reject Suit on Federal Money for Faith-Based Office By LINDA GREENHOUSE Published: June 26, 2007 WASHINGTON, June 25 — The Supreme Court on Monday closed the courthouse door on a lawsuit challenging the Bush administration’s use of taxpayer money to support its Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. By a vote of 5 to 4, the court ruled that taxpayers could not sue to block federal expenditures that they allege violate the constitutional separation of church and state. For 39 years, the court has recognized an exception to a general rule that taxpayers do not have standing to sue to stop government expenditures with which they disagree. That exception, created in the 1968 case of Flast v. Cohen, allowed taxpayers to challenge spending on programs that they believed promoted religion. But yesterday’s decision said that precedent did not apply in this case. The five-member majority was split between those justices who would have overruled the precedent entirely and those who, interpreting it narrowly, held that it did not apply to the lawsuit at issue. While there was no opinion for the court, the narrower basis for disposing of the case prevailed in an opinion by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. that was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy. These three said that, properly interpreted, the Flast v. Cohen precedent permits taxpayer challenges to religion programs explicitly set up and specifically financed by Congress. Since the Bush administration created the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives by executive order and is paying for it out of general appropriations, the precedent does not apply, the three justices said. The other two in the majority, Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, objected that “there is no intellectual justification for this limitation.” Declaring that “if this court is to decide cases by rule of law rather than show of hands, we must surrender to logic and choose sides,” Justice Scalia made clear which side he was on, in an opinion that Justice Thomas signed. Flast v. Cohen was “an inkblot on our jurisprudence,” they said. The dissenters also objected, from the other direction, to the distinction that the Alito opinion drew. “If the executive could accomplish through the exercise of discretion exactly what Congress cannot do through legislation, Establishment Clause protection would melt away,” Justice David H. Souter wrote in a dissenting opinion that was also signed by Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. The case began as a lawsuit brought against the administration in 2004 by a secular advocacy group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, to challenge the constitutionality of conferences that the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives has been running to instruct religious organizations on how to apply for federal grants. Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the foundation, said in an interview on Monday that her organization, based in Madison, Wis., was relieved that the court had not used the case as an occasion to overturn Flast v. Cohen. She said that many of the foundation’s other cases were either challenges to state programs in state court, or challenges to federal programs established by Congressional action. Neither category of lawsuits will be affected by the ruling, Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, No. 06-157. Justice Alito’s opinion, while concluding that “we leave Flast as we found it,” was implicitly quite critical of the precedent. “It is significant that, in the four decades since its creation, the Flast exception has largely been confined to its facts,” he said. That is a description of a decision that has become a dead end in the law, a description that often precedes a decision to revisit and overrule such a precedent. But it was apparent from a brief concurring opinion by Justice Kennedy that the day of reckoning has not yet arrived for Flast v. Cohen. Justice Kennedy described the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment as conveying “the Constitution’s special concern that freedom of conscience not be compromised by government taxing and spending in support of religion.” He added, “In my view the result reached in Flast is correct and should not be called into question.” However, Justice Kennedy said, he agreed that the precedent should be limited as Justice Alito’s opinion proposed. Otherwise, he said, “courts would soon assume the role of speech editors for communications issued by executive officials and event planners for meetings they hold.” nytimes.com

To: Thomas M. who wrote (341273)	6/26/2007 1:36:01 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1578195

<<< ... The contrast between Abbas' action and the Hamas response is striking. Abbas, perhaps pushed by the same coterie of advisors, seems to be escalating the confrontation and doing so when there is no reason to believe he can prevail. Hamas, while standing firm and from a position of strength, spoke in a language of conciliation, emphasizing time and again that Hamas has a problem with only a small group within Fatah, not its rank and file ... >>> A Setback For The Bush Doctrine In Gaza The Bush Doctrine? That's way to complicated for Bush. He has a silver dollar in the Oval office.........when he has to make a decision, he flips the coin. Unfotunately for Lebanon, it was on the bad side of one of those tosses.