Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (101134)	6/25/2007 3:20:55 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 173976

oh stop lying, talk to Larry Kudlow about Clinton

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (101134)	6/25/2007 8:25:32 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 173976

WASHINGTON, June 25 — A District of Columbia administrative law judge, cousin of kennyrat, who filed a $54 million lawsuit against his neighborhood dry cleaner over a pair of missing pants will not get a penny, a court here ruled today. Judge Judith Bartnoff of Superior Court ruled that Judge Roy L. Pearson Jr. failed to prove that Custom Dry Cleaners misled consumers with its “satisfaction guaranteed” sign. For that matter, Judge Pearson was not even able to convince her that the owners of the dry cleaner had lost his pants. “The court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief whatsoever,” Judge Bartnoff wrote. She ordered Judge Pearson to pay the defendants’ court costs, such as transcript and filing fees, which their lawyer said today could run as high as $5,000. But Judge Bartnoff has yet to rule on their motion for lawyers’ fees, which could top $100,000 and will hinge on whether she deems the lawsuit frivolous. Judge Pearson, who represented himself, rejected a settlement offer of $12,000 in March. He asked for damages as high as $67.3 million, using a formula charging each of the store’s owners with multiple breaches of Washington’s consumer protection law. (He later lowered his claim to $54 million.) He did not answer his phone or his door or respond to an e-mail message today. Though Judge Pearson is expected to appeal, the verdict brings at least momentary pause to a case that has inspired international ridicule and calls for legal reform. Since he sued in June 2005, the case has cycled through two judges, three settlement offers, dozens of exhibits and hundreds of pages of court filings. A two-day trial that saw both plaintiff and defendant shed tears ended earlier this month. “We are very, very pleased with the results today,” Soo Chung, a Korean immigrant who owns Custom Dry Cleaners with her husband and son, said today at a news conference outside their shop in Northeast Washington, speaking through a translator. “It’s been such a hard past two years.” Mr. Pearson, then fresh on the job as an administrative law judge, had accused the Chungs of losing a pair of suit pants he had brought in for a $10.50 alteration job. He asserted that Washington’s consumer protection law, one of the nation’s most consumer friendly, entitled him to thousands of dollars for each day over nearly four years in which signs at the shop promised “same day service” and “satisfaction guaranteed.” Mrs. Chung said she found his pants a few days after they were lost. But Judge Pearson claimed they were a cheaper gray pair she had tried to substitute for his pinstriped Hickey Freemans. In her verdict Monday, Judge Bartnoff said she found Mrs. Chung more credible than Judge Pearson. Further, she disputed Judge Pearson’s claim that a “satisfaction guaranteed” sign entitled unhappy customers to unlimited compensation. “A reasonable consumer would not interpret ‘satisfaction guaranteed’ to mean that a merchant is required to satisfy a customer’s unreasonable demands,” she wrote. Suevon Lee contributed reporting. More Articles in National »