SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (234202)6/25/2007 3:40:43 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Pre judice" means "before judicial". Often used to describe a decision being made about an individual before that individual person's character, actions and intentions have been revealed.

So, for example, meeting a Negro and breaking into Ebonics to communicate with them would be prejudice. Though if they were dressed a certain way and behaved a certain way, one could reasonably guess that the lingo would work.

<you can try to make the small number of radicals in the Islamic world >

Those guys are super turbo charged if their numbers are so small. They are creating carnage around the world.

What do you think Salman Rushdie's chances of walking unprotected around any Islamic city and coming out alive or unmaimed would be? Your idea of the proportions is way off beam.

Your 2% is certainly doing a LOT of carnage in Iraq <I imagine the number of actual throat slitters is probably less than 2% of the population (if that- I'm guessing high). You can generalize with statistics on your side, but your trying to defend prejudice untethered from the reality you claim you observe, but obviously don't. Reality includes all the people NOT doing criminal acts, as well as the few that do. >

And they are doing it against a hugely powerful USA.

In fact, polls show it's about 20% in the UK like to see some carnage like the bombings.

You are dealing in more of your fiction with your 2%.

Hamas WON the election. You are ignoring reality, preferring your fantasies.

Maybe you should read less fiction and history [which has all finished or is just silly imaginary games], and catch up with what is actually happening in the here and now and coming down the pike.

Mqurice



To: epicure who wrote (234202)6/25/2007 8:51:38 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Re: aside from a few guys who launched an attack in NY

A few guys????

thereligionofpeace.com



To: epicure who wrote (234202)6/27/2007 5:50:13 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
WE invaded Kuwait?

You are a fool.



To: epicure who wrote (234202)6/29/2007 11:36:44 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
aside from a few guys who launched an attack in NY, I can't say Islamic folks have done much to me

time.com



To: epicure who wrote (234202)6/29/2007 11:42:05 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Now you can say we're in tremendous danger from them, but that doesn't really appear to be the case.

LOL

First Twin Tower bombing
9/11
Khobar Towers
2 African embassies.
USS Cole....all of which preceded Iraq and Afgahnistan.....

Not to mention numerous plots foiled by the FBI since 9/11.

Wake up and smell the coffee.