SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (11250)6/26/2007 12:12:30 AM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224750
 
Bush did absolutely nothing to avenge the USS Cole attack. The CIA brought him evidence Al Qaida did it in February 2001. Clinton didn't know who did it for sure. Bush got the hard evidence and did nothing. Then he ignored numerous pre 9-11 warnings. Did nothing. Over and over again. Did nothing. Then let Osama Bin LAden go after he promised us he'd catch him "dead or alive". The Bush family and Bin Laden family are old friends and business associates.

Give Bush a pass for this?



To: RMF who wrote (11250)6/27/2007 4:22:54 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Clinton refused custody of bin Laden when he was offered by an African country that was trying to curry favor with the U.S. As always Pres Clinton was concerned the UN community would not approve of such action.
Shortly after he left office, Clinton stated he felt the "legal" case against bin Laden wasn't strong enough to warrant his apprehension. That was the problem with Presidents Carter & Clinton, they both allowed international "opinion" to take precedence over the national security of their fellow Americans. Presidents Truman & Kennedy were the last Democrats to make national security decisions with steely determination to protect American citizens.