Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (9466)	6/26/2007 10:34:23 AM
From: The Wharf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

That question depends on creation. For if we assume a combination of gasses led to the formation of the first amino acids then we have to ask where did the gases come from? We know how DNA comes to be but we run into the how ws the gas formed where was the explosion that created the gas? Then because we cannot totally explain creation does the unknown become God? To me it is man who uses a written word God for self right purpose that is the problem. Yet because God is blind belief man can pretty well apply ridiculous ideas and attribute them to God as God is non explainable. There of all are Hindi Then if we assume creation started from gas and we do not know how to identify where the gases came from God must reside outside of humans. On the other hand the moral inner code humans live by certainly has to be part of the string of DNA as well as recognized environmental difference , so God resides inside as well as outside. We do know the chicken came before the egg! The beginning of a lesson in the problems of valuating a stock.