Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (234506)	6/27/2007 6:05:06 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

We invaded because there were occupiers (in Normandy), right? Are you aware Kuwait was occupied? We had to invade to dispel Saddam's occupying force. I didn't say we invaded to kick out the Kuwaitis, but we most certainly invaded, as a conquering force, to kick out the occupying Iraqis. Fool. You guys always jump to stupid conclusions, assuming everyone else is as stupid as you are. Not always the case. I chose my words carefully. "So yes, in that instance we did invade Normandy in the technical sense. " ROFL I'm sure all the military guys who planned it, and the history writers who write about, are all breathing a sigh of relief that it's "technically" ok for them to use that term.