SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: coug who wrote (75192)6/30/2007 11:00:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Sicko: Beyond the ‘Health Care Horror Stories’

commondreams.org



To: coug who wrote (75192)6/30/2007 7:54:55 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Courage Without the Uniform - NYT.com
____________________________________________________________

By TIMOTHY EGAN
Guest Columnist
The New York Times
June 30, 2007

PORTLAND, Ore. - Every time a soldier from Oregon dies in the Iraq war, Senator Gordon Smith calls up the mother or surviving spouse, and commiserates. His son killed himself four years ago, he tells them. He knows what it’s like to lose a boy.

He has made this call 103 times. Inevitably, after the tears and the awkward pauses, they ask him this question about their lost loved one in Iraq: was it worth it?

“I wish I could tell them what they want to hear,” said Senator Smith, a Republican. “I wish I could tell them something else. I say, ‘I hope history proves me wrong, but...’ ” and then he trails off.

Senator Smith woke up one morning last December with the alarm set to news and traffic — another day, another dozen American soldiers dead. He had his Groundhog Day moment, he says. “I just went from steamed to boiled.”

Later, on the floor of the Senate, he said the words that are still echoing around the political world:

“I, for one, am at the end of my rope when it comes to supporting a policy that has our soldiers patrolling the same streets in the same way, being blown up by the same bombs day after day. This is absurd. It may even be criminal.”

It was that last word that set people on fire. Conservatives called him a traitor — to the party, the country. Liberals embraced him. Bring on impeachment!

If anything, the senator feels stronger today than he did then, though he said he would change one word in his speech. “If I could take back any word, it would be ‘criminal,’ ” he said. “I’d replace it with the word ‘insane.’ ”

At the time, Smith was one of only two Republicans in the Senate — the other being the maverick, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska — to come out against the president’s war policy. This week, Richard Lugar of Indiana joined other Republican senators who have since broken ranks, making at least six who are calling for a new policy.

By the time Congress takes up the postsurge failures of the war in September, there may be a dozen or more Republicans in the Senate ready to defy the president, said Mr. Smith.

The war has started to resemble a postapocalyptic sci-fi film like “Blade Runner.” Here is a troubled superpower headed by a pair of delusional men, with a rag-tag army fighting a constant low-grade insurgency. The cause has long since been forgotten, the slogans are hollow, death lurks around every shadowy corner.

But if we are to retrieve our honor, to restore our place in the world, to make good on those lost Oregon lives, it may be because people like Gordon Smith couldn’t take it any more, that he finally said enough — bring the kids home.

Smith is a Mormon who did his mission abroad and an Eagle Scout from the eastern Oregon town of Pendleton — one of the West’s most authentic places, part Indian, part cowboy. A senator for 10 years, he is up for re-election next year.

His reading of World War I, when Europe’s finest were thrown up against machine guns day after day, and a more recent book, “Fiasco,” Tom Ricks’s devastating account of American blunders in Iraq, left him sleepless and angered.

After visiting Iraq three times, he has concluded that those in power “are more focused on revenge than reconciliation — it’s a quicksand of ancient hatreds.”

Some people question the timing of the senator’s change of heart. Smith is vulnerable in this blue state, they say, and his conversion is just a ploy to save his seat. But there is something else at work here. Smith has the seat once held by Senator Mark Hatfield, another Republican who defied his party on matters of war and peace. Hatfield was a Navy man, a veteran of Iwo Jima and one of the first Americans to see Hiroshima after the atomic bomb was dropped. All that carnage changed his world view.

Smith was never in the armed forces. His biggest regret in life, he says, is that he never wore his country’s uniform. But unlike some chicken-hawks who did not serve — chief among them, Vice President Cheney, with his numerous draft deferments — he is not trying to make up for lost courage.

Not long ago, Hatfield called up the junior senator from Oregon and brought up the fact that Smith, once a vigorous booster, had changed his mind on the war.

“I’m proud of you for that,” he said. It meant a lot, coming from Hatfield, who is a giant in Oregon politics. But it meant even more that he was an ex-warrior.

-Timothy Egan, a former Seattle correspondent for The New York Times and the author of “The Worst Hard Time,” is a guest columnist.

tinyurl.com



To: coug who wrote (75192)7/3/2007 2:10:54 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Independence Day Comes Early for Libby

villagevoice.com



To: coug who wrote (75192)7/15/2007 3:21:01 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Ron Paul warns of staged terror attack

politico.com



To: coug who wrote (75192)7/16/2007 12:01:00 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
BILL MOYERS JOURNAL: Tough Talk on Impeachment

demandchangenow.blogspot.com



To: coug who wrote (75192)7/20/2007 12:26:44 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: coug who wrote (75192)8/5/2007 3:18:31 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Outbreak of truth-telling to Congress on Iraq

mcclatchydc.com

Joseph L. Galloway | McClatchy Newspapers

The Bush administration and the Pentagon were rocked back on their heels this week by an unfamiliar outburst of public truth-telling by the admiral President Bush has nominated to be the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The simple, stark answers on the future of the surge and the prospects of “winning” the war in Iraq that Adm. Mike Mullen gave to the Senate Armed Services Committee came hard on the heels of another embarrassing episode of truthfulness by FBI Director Robert Mueller in the matter of Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, who makes Richard Nixon’s attorney general, John Mitchell, look like an honest man by comparison.

All of it was so unnerving that it smoked Vice President Dick Cheney out from under the bed in his “undisclosed secret location” and out onto the talk shows, where he defended both Gonzalez and his former chief of staff, convicted liar Scooter Libby, and declared that invading Iraq was a good thing to do.

Still, the greatest shock was Adm. Mullens’ testimony, in which he said that the escalation of American troop strength in Iraq to 160,000 had improved things somewhat: “Security is better. Not great, but better.”

Then, responding to a question, the admiral acknowledged that the Iraqi government has made little, if any, progress in reaching the political compromises that are crucial to the future of that country. He added that without a political settlement between the Shiite Muslim majority and the Sunni minority there can be no victory in Iraq, regardless of how many American troops are sent there or how many years they remain.

The admiral went even further in his statement to the senators, saying that the surge is temporary and can't be sustained past April of 2008, and in any case he wouldn't sustain it by extending the troops' already extended combat tours beyond the present 15 months.

What a remarkable breath of fresh air to hear the man tapped to be the nation’s highest ranking military officer speak frankly and honestly about the security situation in Iraq and the faltering government in Baghdad. The outgoing chairman, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, and his predecessor, Air Force Gen. Richard Myers, failed miserably when it came to saying anything other than “Sir, yes, Sir!” to their civilian bosses.

In Iraq, meanwhile, American officers allowed to McClatchy Newspapers' Mark Seibel and Leila Fadel, albeit anonymously, that the Shiite militias that have close ties to the Iraqi government are the real enemy in Iraq, not al Qaida in Iraq, as President Bush keeps insisting.

Can it be that the Bush administration has run out of military toadies who're willing to sit silently, in resplendent feathers, on civilian shoulders nodding wisely and squawking on cue as one misbegotten plan after another melts down in Iraq’s broiling deserts? Or has the arrival of Robert Gates as secretary of defense, in place of the unlamented Donald H. Rumsfeld, liberated the generals and admirals to say what they think rather than what they think the boss wants to hear?

Either way, the American people are much better off, and we can only hope that speaking the truth is infectious and soon will become epidemic, to the further shock and awe of the president and his remaining men.

What Adm. Mullens said was what other military commanders have said before — and what the president has stubbornly refused to hear — that nothing we do militarily can win this war. Victory can be achieved only by the Iraqis themselves, and so far none of them is willing to negotiate or even speak to each other in good faith.

Until they're willing to relinquish ancient blood feuds in the name of national unity, there’s not one thing that 160,000 American troops, or 320,000 American troops, can do except stand between the warring parties and remain targets for all of them.

Meanwhile, we're treated to the spectacle of both the Iraqi parliament and the American Congress going home for their summer vacations while the American casualty lists in Iraq are longer than those of the Iraqi Army.

While we wait through the dog days of August for Gen. Petraeus’ and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker's progress report in September, we can only hope that the outbreak of truth telling spreads to the general and the ambassador.