Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (234738)	6/30/2007 3:42:14 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You're right, I meant to say "headlines", not "coverage". The headlines of the newpapers said "D-Day!" in HUGE letters, you can go and look. And I had no problem finding Arrowhead Ripper in the headlines either. jttmab

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (234738)	6/30/2007 6:36:22 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

And what, exactly constitutes an NPR "headline", he dryly asks. The "things are going really well in Iraq" line has been sadly absent here for a while, good to see you bringing it back. The issue did come up elsewhere in the past week, though: Last year, Fox relentlessly pushed claims that the “liberal media” were failing to report the “good news” from Iraq. Once that line became untenable — well, the Project for Excellence in Journalism found that in the first quarter of 2007 daytime programs on Fox News devoted only 6 percent of their time to the Iraq war, compared with 18 percent at MSNBC and 20 percent at CNN. What took Iraq’s place? Anna Nicole Smith, who received 17 percent of Fox’s daytime coverage. ( from select.nytimes.com ) You may now return to your usual "anybody who doesn't stand with W and me is like a nazi appeaser" line, or whatever other retread propaganda you're flogging these days.