Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (210232)	7/1/2007 8:16:23 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793928

I believe she would be tougher on terror than the others. She would need the distraction. She is the best of a bad lot. But if any Dem gets in, it's the flying monkeys from Koz, etc, they bring with them. And appoint to office.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (210232)	7/1/2007 9:16:55 AM
From: Stevefoder	Respond to of 793928

I believe she would be tougher on terror You can expect that on military or security matters Hillary would be tougher than the other Democrats partly because she is a women. When a women gets in a job like president, she would have to prove to the world that she can be as tough as a man or tougher. Many cultures in the world do not respect women at all. She would have to prove herself. Example in history: People that understand Argentine culture often believe that Argentina would not have invaded the Falklands had a man been Prime Minister of the UK. When the invasion happened Thatcher had to prove herself and the UK's resolve.