Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sea Otter who wrote (14394)	7/2/2007 8:14:56 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 36917

by those who have no monetary interest in a particular outcome, and who are simply interested in the facts. Sure they are totally unconcerned that if they hadn't put in a PC agreement on global warming they'd become unpublishable. P.S. If you bothered to read the report (which you obviously didn't), you would know that the researchers have no doubt about global warming. Yes I noted they covered their ass, thus hopefully making it acceptable for them to knock down one of Gore's icons. But is their PC opinion about global warming based on their scientific work? Nah. Its based on a desire to keep themselves employable and publishable. You didn't answer my question about Gore. We know that Gore's claim about Kilimanjaro is wrong. Does that make him a propagandist? BTW he and his family have grown tobacco for generations and his family has a lot of oil money too. Does that make everything he says a lie? If you want to call Heartland propagandistic, fine. But you should admit there are propagandists on the other side too.