Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (235048)	7/2/2007 7:02:07 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Your 'What ifs' are too far fetched and vague to deal with. Why would he need to lie to protect the where abouts of someone in his movement? The movement was huge and I'm not sure it's accurate claim he owned it. Anything that big must have had some extremists who were criminal and worthy of arrest for unwholesome activity. If he had lied to protect the whereabouts of someone in the movement who was using drug/prostitution/burglary money to finance part of the movement, the part that was financing a bombing attempt on Governor Wallaces mansion. ... what would the lie be? You seem to be suggesting something else like 'a noble lie'; which I would happily consider if you think you can provide the scenario but simply saying he is protecting the where abouts of someone who supports civil rights aint enough to argue your point.