Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Stocks who wrote (83329)	7/3/2007 1:32:49 PM
From: Travis_Bickle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

What damage did Martha Stewart do by selling $255,000 of stock? And she only lied to the FBI, not to a grand jury.

To: Joe Stocks who wrote (83329)	7/4/2007 6:08:12 AM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

"There was no "potential" breach of national security in regards to the charges against Libby." No. The charges against Libby stemmed from his role in the conspiracy that involved Cheney wantonly compromising national security. Because of Libby's smoke screen of lies and perjury, the truth of who (Cheney) authorized and directed the compromise of an undercover CIA asset (Plame) could not be established. Fitzgerald had neither the balls nor the backing in Justice to go after the real crooks (Bush/Cheney). Libby was the designated fall guy, and the assholes didn't even have the integrity to let him take a hit.