SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (210622)7/3/2007 4:35:26 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793958
 
Dianne Feinsten is a WAR PROFITEER

During much of the time that Sen. Dianne Feinstein was a leader on the Senate subcommittee overseeing the Pentagon’s military construction budget, her husband was heavily invested in companies holding hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts generated by the subcommittee’s activities.

The California Democrat denied that she helped her husband’s companies in any way with contracts and said the Senate ethics committee approved the arrangement. But she declined to discuss the value of the contracts or release the ethics ruling.

A Copley News Service review found no evidence that Feinstein had intervened in any clearly meaningful way on behalf of the two companies.

But it also found that the Senate appropriations and military procurement processes are so opaque there is little the public can do but trust Feinstein when she denies helping her husband’s companies. Secrecy and a lack of documentation make independent confirmation impossible.

sondrak.com



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (210622)7/3/2007 8:25:17 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793958
 
I truly am puzzled. Why did Fitzgerald waste time, money, energy, peoples lives and careers, when he knew who leaked anything two yeaars before????

And was the leak really an unknown fact, or was the fact that Plame worked for the CIA, and her hubby has blathered her name all over for some time, of any importance.

Is a leak really a leak, if the material consisting the leak is public record?