Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bearclaw51 who wrote (10394)	7/4/2007 2:05:06 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12518

Way to go Turek...Let the Judge sort it out. Put away the pom poms. They only make you look silly. Turek claimed in a press release that Plasticon owned patents worth $20M ( see: Message 22805670 ). Turek used these patents as collateral to take out six figure loans-- loans he never paid off. The burden of proof, to show that he not only had controlled these patents but also that these patents had the value he claimed, is squarely on Turek. Unless Turek decides to answer the questions posed to him, there's nothing for the judge to sort out. Could it be that if Turek answers in a way contradictory to his press release, he knows he has given the SEC a smoking gun? Can you say "check mate"? BTW, assuming you are truly a shareholder, don't you want to know if "your" company owns the patents and what their worth truly is? - Jeff