Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (102164)	7/8/2007 11:51:22 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

re:"Water vapor is more significant, much more so, than CO2. I've already told you that. " Yeah, you told me that.....now tell me where you learned that.... I don't know where I read it. I read a lot. re:"Nobody can tell you how significant a source of global warming CO2 is. " Do you have any qualifications to make that point or do you have a link that makes that argument? The scientists of every country in the world disagree with you. If it isn't true, refer me to studies which prove the exact relationship between ppm of CO2 and temperature. No all the scientists in the world don't disagree with me. That is a classic example of an appeal to authority used when one has a weak argument. re:"Your ideas of scientific matters seems to have been arrested at that level." What qualifies you to say that? May I ask what your profession is/was? I'm almost certain it had nothing to do with science or engineering. I'm a CPA, which means nothing. My general reading on scientific matters is the basis for my opinion. Whatever your educational background is, you don't write intelligently or knowledgably. You soune like a simpleton. re:"Yes, I recognize the universe is complex. You deny the obvious." That's hilarious...!! You recognize the complexity of the universe but say the origin of it is obvious. I actually said the fact of the universe's complexity is obvious. How can you know that but can't understand the concept of a simple experiment? You don't recognize anything....you're faking it. You're the one falling back on simplistic arguments on behalf of simplicity. You think you can model the atmosphere with a box?