Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (235680)	7/8/2007 12:42:21 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

It makes as much sense as forcing women to cover their breasts in public while allowing men to have exposed breasts. We even makes laws about. One thought the end of the world was coming when we got a little peak of Janet's breast during the Superbowl. And that was just one breast! FCC throwing fines right and left. Conservative parents having to explain to their children that women had breasts. I'm interested in hearing a pro-Muslim poster advocate the position that women should be veiled while men are not, and explain to us why veiled women is preferable to not having women veiled. I'm not that interested to read everyone's complaint about western culture......

To: jttmab who wrote (235680)	7/8/2007 1:42:23 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 281500

Re: It makes as much sense as forcing women to cover their breasts in public while allowing men to have exposed breasts. There is no analogy there, try as you might to make one.