Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tyc:> who wrote (44313)	7/8/2007 7:05:46 PM
From: koan	Respond to of 78422

You are right tyc, I did it in reverse, no wonder it looked so good-lol. I will see if I can figure it out.

To: tyc:> who wrote (44313)	7/8/2007 7:19:54 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

IMG wts: tyc, they still look like a huge bargin. The wt page says they should be worth $2 and they are .86?? They are deep in the money even multiplying 2.3 X's .86 = $1.97, plus teh $3.75 = $5,72. The stock is $8.30. What am I missing here? This shouldn't be?? I checked the Canadian wts figures against BWR and they were right on the money?? Got up early and am tired, but that certainly seems worth investigating. Very puzzling?? Where is Euclid when you need him-lol?