Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (11879)	7/8/2007 11:18:10 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224755

Bush should not have pardoned Libby. The only reason Bush did was to shut him up so he wouldn't incriminate Cheney, who is very-very guilty and has tons to hide. Libby knows where all the bodies are buried. So it was a bush money type pardon. That is 100%v unethical and illegal. The founding fathers stated such when they wrote up the Constitution. Pardoning someone to protect your own ass is illegal. for one thing it's obstruction of justice. It is also full-on Mafia tactics. Bush-Cheney are now exposed as an organized crime outfit. Nothing more or less.