Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (102258)	7/9/2007 3:08:14 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Wrong again. A person has to knowingly and intentionally out a covert agent to break the law. Fitzgerald said the problem was with the knowingly and intentionally part, not the covert part. We have Fitzgerald's own words. We have the court filing documenting her CIA employment history. And we have the judge's sentence based in part on that filing. You have nothing but empty rhetoric which is contradicted by all available evidence. Why should we take your word over Fitzgerald's and the CIA's? The law has more than one test. Why do you conclude the covert test wasn't met when the prosecutor says otherwise? Where's the sense in that? SD