Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (342588)	7/9/2007 6:23:59 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1575354

If they planted all the trees they have promised you wouldn't be able to walk on the planet. Sorta like the 72 virgins

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (342588)	7/9/2007 8:14:56 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575354

Longnshort, > Razorlight claimed they would plant trees to offset their emissions. Who's going to plant trees to offset the wildfires here in California? Even environmentalists think allowing forests to burn is a good idea, since it takes care of overgrowth ... Uh......not exactly. In a natural setting, a fire started by a lightning strike is nature's way of keeping things in balance. However, fires started by man in the same area repeatedly is of little benefit to the ecology and does more damage than good. As for S. CA, most fires are brush fires, not forest fires, and its not likely they benefit anyone.