Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (102310)	7/10/2007 12:08:11 AM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Funny guy... But you can't show me one dishonest thing i've said. I keep showing you your dishonest post and you keep changing the subject, running away from your own words. (I won't do that if you ever actually come up with something. I won't pretend i don't get what you're saying.) if Plame was indeed covert and Fitz thought he could prove it...he would have filed charges against Armitage... This is clearly wrong and i've shown you why several times. Here's something else you wrote, about Fitzgerald's filing documenting Plame's covert status with the CIA: If its in a public court filing...she's not covert That was laughably stupid, and of course dishonest too. Here's the CIA employment filing: msnbcmedia.msn.com And here's Fitzgerald's press conference where he explains that he did believe Plame to be covert making you, get this, a liar... washingtonpost.com I think that about does it for me on this merry go round, unless you have something new or on point to say, which considering how this has been going is pretty unlikely... SD