SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (60806)7/10/2007 2:08:07 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Airman Shot As a Statement on Independence Day

By Lorie Byrd on Military
Wizbang

Michelle Malkin has the story of Jonathan Schrieken, the airman from McGuire Air Force Base who was shot in his own driveway by a man who then killed himself. The shooter reportedly left two suicide notes indicating he was angry at the government and wanted to make a statement on Independence Day. Patrick Poole at The American Thinker notes the difference in treatment of those who kill members of other groups.
    If Airman Schrieken had been an abortionist or homosexual,
this story would be front page news for the New York Times
and the lead story on CBS News with Katie Couric for at
least the next month. But since Schrieken is serving in
the military, even his hometown newspaper, the Columbus
Dispatch, has ignored this story.

    Predictably, a law enforcement spokesman says that 
Marren's suicide notes "were indicative of an individual
suffering from mental-health problems", but that raises
the question of how anyone could identify anyone suffering
from mental-health problems amidst those devoted to
bizarre conspiracy theories and the virulent anti-
Americanism of the antiwar movement. If anything, Marren
would have fit right in unnoticed.
    It is also worth noting that Marren was merely following 
the logic of the anti-war movement's standard public
rhetoric. Their language is laced with suggestive
undertones justifying attacks against our military,
calling our armed forces fighting the War on Terror "baby-
killers", constantly invoking the specter of Abu Ghraib,
and citing their grossly inflated statistics of civilians
accidentally killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Such reckless
and unbalanced rhetoric (they're not quite as adept at
keeping statistics on those murdered by terrorists) fuels
the hatred that drives someone like Marren to violence
against a member of our own military.
So, if targeting blacks or homosexuals or abortionists can be classified as hate crimes, can crimes against members of the U.S. military?

feeds.wizbangblog.com

michellemalkin.com

americanthinker.com



To: Sully- who wrote (60806)7/10/2007 10:34:18 AM
From: mph  Respond to of 90947
 
<<< I saw a drunk middle-aged man toss his beer bottle in a recycling bin for the first time. Multiply that by 2 billion. That's a measurable outcome. >>>

ROFL!

How did he know it was the *first time*? lol

And if anyone fails to intuitively *get it* that littering causes a mess, that costs money, if nothing else, to clean up, then a bunch of choruses by Madonna isn't going to drive the point home, is it?

Besides that, I'm sure that if littering were penalized by caning as it is in Singapore, many litterbugs would be cured.
Does the author think adoption of caning as a penalty would be sufficiently effective to justify it?

lol