Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (39390)	7/10/2007 2:24:34 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541753

The relationships that matter in the Bush White House revolve around their specific ideological clique. This is why so many people don't grasp the difference between criticizing this administration but not attacking the whole Republican party or real traditional conservatives. This bunch is neither; it cares only about its own, looks after its own and treats everyone else with contempt much of the time. Of course, that is a recipe for implosion in a popular democracy like ours. But they are so addicted to the Kool-Aid they really thought they would build a lasting majority on that foundation. LBJ did a lot to cultivate the Hill and even then, he lost his key supporters by '68, just like Bush is losing them one by one now.

To: JohnM who wrote (39390)	7/10/2007 2:35:14 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541753

It's also clearly a way, in its ruthlessness, the Bush WH is categorically different from Lyndon Johnson's. His, as we know, was all about personal relationships. It's because LBJ was a creature of the Hill. He learned from people like Rayburn and Russell. And they had a sense of institutional pride in Congress. And Johnson, whatever else he was (and, as you know from Caro, he was a lot of seemingly contradictory things), had a sense of history, and a desire to build on the legacy of FDR. And of course it helped their sense of institutional pride that, as Speaker and Majority Leader, Rayburn and Johnson could together control the Hill (not that that was in the spirit of the Constitution either, but nevermind--better that than have the WH and Congress all warm and cozy with each other). But Bush had people like Frist and Hastert, who said more than once that their primary function was to shepherd the Bush agenda through Congress, not to mention the other crook from Texas who was primarily motivated by profit and the feeling of power.