Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (236027)	7/12/2007 2:54:55 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

All the deaths in Iraq since we invaded can be blamed on Bush, as will the bloodbath after we leave. Civil wars ALWAYS tend to be boodbaths, but are unavoidable once begun and must run their course. We don't have to have OUR troops in the middle. Saddam looks just SO much better in hindsight. THERE was a man who had "solved the problem of Iraq". Who KNEW he was controlling such a potential hell-hole of violence, and doing it with such apparent ease!

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (236027)	7/12/2007 3:11:51 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>" They have an interesting sense of morality at the NYT, that's all I can say. Do deaths not count if they can be blamed on Bush? "<< Well let's see now...If the troops are pulled out of Iraq, who will have been the "The Great Decider" of that decision? Well my gosh, it will have been the NY Times editorial writers. Who else could it be? Certainly not the Great Decider. None of the Great Decider's decisions have a "sense of morality" unless they are dealing with stem cells or commutations. Everyone knows that the other decisions of the Great Decider are just "resolute" so the "genocide" that is occurring right now in Iraq must be due to the "interesting morality sense" of the NY Times editorial writers. Yup, that makes sense...from now on any deaths in Iraq not counted will be blamed on the the New York Times editorial writers.