Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (211912)	7/13/2007 1:43:31 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793964

It's not nice to abrogate treaties. Not nice to back out of any contract. You don't sign contracts with the intention of backing out later. Lack of good faith. Better not to sign in the first place. As for isolationism, I think that piece on CAFTA directly addresses the point. It's not like folks from different countries can't trade without treaties. You shouldn't have to document it.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (211912)	7/13/2007 11:39:15 PM
From: MrLucky	Respond to of 793964

Ron Paul votes on Free Trade: Voted NO on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade. (Jul 2005) Voted NO on implementing US-Australia Free Trade Agreement. (Jul 2004) Voted NO on implementing US-Singapore free trade agreement. (Jul 2003) Voted NO on implementing free trade agreement with Chile. (Jul 2003) Voted YES on withdrawing from the WTO. (Jun 2000) Voted NO on 'Fast Track' authority for trade agreements. (Sep 1998) No restrictions on import/export; but maintain sovereignty . (Dec 2000) End economic protectionism: let dairy compacts expire . (Aug 2001) Rated 76% by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record. (Dec 2002)