SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (81206)7/15/2007 3:05:34 PM
From: JBTFDRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
I think if they wanted to be more accurate with monitoring housing inflation they could use two parts, each weighted proportionately to the weight in the population.

They could have a renters part, which would be something like 30% weighting and would be the same as the now used rental equivalency. Then they should have a housing cost part, which would reflect actual housing prices. This currently would have a weighting of 70% or so: whatever the homeownership rate is.

I think this would more accurately reflect inflation.

I think it is a little disingenuous to pretend that rising housing prices are not inflationary.



To: GraceZ who wrote (81206)7/15/2007 5:05:40 PM
From: GSTRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Actually Grace you have it wrong on housing and inflation. A house is not a promise to pay cash in the future -- while that is what a bond is, along with regular cash payments to pay "rent" on the money. Housing on the other hand is a hard commodity -- and yes it can be a useful one at that. Housing prices go up in inflationary times because money is depreciating and is risky to hold. People take a short position on cash by borrowing to buy a house and then go long housing by buying a house -- that is the traditional relationship between cash and housing in an inflationary environment -- short cash, long housing.