SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (236712)7/17/2007 11:18:15 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 281500
 
if the victors are Jews, land taken in war in the middle east must always be returned, even if there is no peace to be had.

There should be a special footnote in all history books for this fact.



To: Elroy who wrote (236712)7/17/2007 12:00:05 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"No, its common to occupy land and keep it, for centuries until the next larger army came along. The indigenous population was generally either killed or turned into slaves, or at least turned into slavelike labor on farms owned by the victors."

That's completely wrong in modern times Elroy. Did we "keep" Germany or Japan? Has any modern nation other than Israel kept the land it's armies have swept over? No.

It's too expensive, and too likely to become an insurgent quagmire as in Iraq. The cost/benefit just isn't there. If you keep it, you're RESPONSIBLE for it.



To: Elroy who wrote (236712)7/17/2007 12:01:14 PM
From: Lou Weed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
<<No, its common to occupy land and keep it, for centuries until the next larger army came along. The indigenous population was generally either killed or turned into slaves, or at least turned into slavelike labor on farms owned by the victors.>>

I stand corrected.....empires come and go but regions, once conquered and colonized, eventually develop into autonomous states once an empire crumbles. Europe is the perfect example of such a dynamic.

Peace is only possible in a newly conquered region (which is what we're talking about here) if you.....

a) Anhialate and enslave the population, or

b) Broker an agreement for right of return and un-occupy....

a) is not an option although I get the feeling some people here think it should. b) is the only way. Israel wants to control and occupy the land yet is stunned that the displaced population is not particularly enthusiastic about this plan.

If peace is what Israel wants then a right of return to an independent Palestinian state is what it needs to let happen. Whether Israel is Jewish, Christian, Islamic or Atheist doesn't matter a toss.......