Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (343453)	7/17/2007 2:47:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575597

Chris, > The '67 borders were the agreed upon way to settle the situation by the majority at the United Nations. Israel has been in violation almost continually since. I guess when the Arabs at the time vowed to "throw the Jews into the sea," that wasn't a violation of the 1967 borders? Tenchusatsu

To: bentway who wrote (343453)	7/18/2007 3:07:07 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1575597

The '67 borders were the agreed upon way to settle the situation by the majority at the United Nations. Don't you mean the original UN partition borders? Israel had slightly different borders in 1967 from what the UN approved in 1948 (or whenever it was). Anyway, do you realize that in the UN vote to establish Israel none of Israel's neighbor countries and no Arab country voted Yes. What does it matter that Bolivia (a UN member in 1948) voted to establish Israel? If Jordan, Egypt and all the neighbor countries say No, why does the fact that Bolivia, in South America, said Yes mean anything? Doesn't that seem a bit ridiculous to you?