SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: yard_man who wrote (8036)7/18/2007 12:35:03 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Credit Meltdown gaining momentum--Subprime Uncertainty Fans Out Bear's Hedge Funds Are Basically Worthless;More Bond Fire Sales

By KATE KELLY , SERENA NG and MICHAEL HUDSON
July 18, 2007; Page C1

Investors in two troubled Bear Stearns Cos. hedge funds that made big bets on subprime mortgages have been practically wiped out, the Wall Street firm said yesterday, in more evidence of the turmoil in this corner of the bond market.

Bear said one of its funds was worth nothing and another worth less than a 10th of its value from a few months ago after its subprime trades went bad, according to a letter Bear circulated and to people briefed by the firm. The Wall Street investment bank -- known for its bond-trading savvy -- has had to put up $1.6 billion in rescue financing.

The revelations marked another anxious day for subprime investors. As a market index that tracks the performance of subprime bonds hit new lows, signs emerged that the pain experienced by Bear's hedge-fund investors is being felt by investors around the world.

Wall Street firms yesterday circulated at least a dozen lists of subprime-related bonds they planned to hastily sell to investors. Some of the assets were from a fund managed by Basis Capital, a large hedge-fund manager based in Australia, and were put on the block by Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., according to people familiar with the matter.

Basis Yield Alpha Fund last week informed its investors it had lost around 14% in June. Another fund, called Basis Pac-Rim Fund, was down 9.2% that month. Basis said the declines came after bond dealers abruptly marked down the value of the securities, which it said were "otherwise fundamentally sound."

Investors are struggling to place values on assets tied to subprime home loans. Because some of these instruments aren't actively traded, investors worry that they are holding securities on their books at values that are no longer accurate.

• What's Next: How low will the key ABX index, which tracks subprime bonds, go? It hit a new low yesterday."The Funds' reported performance, in part, reflects the unprecedented declines in the valuations of a number of highly rated" securities, Bear brokers wrote in a letter disseminated to clients yesterday.

Last week, Moody's Investors Service and Standard and Poor's, the two big credit-rating services, knocked down their assessments on hundreds of mostly lower-rated subprime-backed bonds.

Delinquencies and defaults have been rising on subprime mortgages -- which are taken out by borrowers with shaky credit backgrounds. Some of these mortgages were subject to fraudulent loan documentation when they were written.

The problems haven't filtered into the stock market, which hit new records yesterday. But the mortgage-bond market is filled with uncertainty, and investors show signs of aversion to risky corporate bonds, too.

"Right now things are starting to come unglued," said Charles Gradante, co-founder of hedge-fund consultant Hennessee Group.

The net value of assets in Bear's highly indebted fund, High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, is wiped out, according to people familiar with the matter, who were briefed on the contents of a late-afternoon call with brokers. The net value of assets in its other, larger, less-leveraged fund is roughly 9% of the value at the end of March, these people said. The net-asset value represents the value of an investor's holdings after debts have been paid.

The funds invested in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized-debt obligations, which are bundles of bonds. The funds also made other bets in the debt markets through various derivative investments.

In March, before their sharp losses, the enhanced-leverage fund had $638 million in investor money, while the other fund had $925 million.

The funds' net values, which took more than two weeks to calculate because of the fluctuating values in the market for risky, or subprime, mortgage securities, came amid another tumultuous day for the broader mortgage market.

The ABX index, which tracks the performance of various classes of subprime-related bonds, hit new lows yesterday. In the past few months, the portions of the index that tracked especially risky mortgage bonds with junk-grade ratings had been falling. But now, the portions of the index that track safer mortgage bonds, with ratings of triple-A or double-A, are also falling sharply.

The portion of the index that tracks triple-A subprime debt issued last year has fallen about 5% in the past week. The portion of the index that tracks low-rated triple-B bonds is down more than 50% this year.

Investors have been buzzing for days, trying to explain the latest losses in the ABX index, which signaled a deepening panic in the mortgage market. Several factors have been at play, including the ratings downgrades.

It also could have been related to mortgage-backed-securities holders' hedging of positions by making bets against the index. Or it could have been because speculators are betting the subprime woes will worsen.

The index isn't a perfect indicator of the health of these securities, because it represents only a narrow slice of the subprime-bond market, and it isn't widely traded. Nevertheless, investors are watching it closely.

"The decline in the ABX indexes has been significant, and certainly some people are panicking and shorting it further because many assets they own are going down in value," says Alan Fournier of hedge fund Pennant Capital, which has been betting against the subprime market.

Several traders said Calyon, the investment-bank division of French bank Credit Agricole SA, was active in the market. In a May conference call, bank officials said some of its dealings in collateralized debt obligations -- which are bundles of bonds sometimes holding subprime mortgages -- had "suffered from the crisis" in subprime. It could have been forced to hedge against exposure by taking positions that pushed the index lower.

A Calyon spokeswoman said in a statement that the firm doesn't have any "direct exposure" to subprime home-equity loans, though it is involved in warehousing asset-backed securities that are used for CDO transactions that Calyon arranges.

In the statement, spokeswoman Virginie Ourceyre said the asset-backed securities market "has been volatile since the middle of the first quarter. Since then, Calyon has not originated any new ABS CDO deals." She added that Calyon has been "actively managing its credit-trading books."

Treasurys End Down as Bernanke Is Awaited

The U.S. Treasury bond market had a jumpy day as subprime worries lingered. Prices ended lower as investors remained cautious ahead of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's testimony before Congress today and tomorrow.

At 3 p.m., the benchmark 10-year note was down 9/32 point, or $2.8125 per $1,000 face value, at 95 18/32. Its yield rose to 5.078% from 5.043% Monday, as yields move inversely to prices. The 30-year bond shed 16/32 point to yield 5.161%.

"There's the fear that Bernanke is going to be once again hawkish over the next few days," said Tom di Galoma, managing director and head of Treasurys at Jefferies & Co., referring to concerns that the Fed chief could continue to stress the risks to the economy from inflation.

markit.com

check out

ABX-HE-BBB- 06-2



To: yard_man who wrote (8036)7/18/2007 1:15:18 AM
From: nspolar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
No the bearish count imo does not line up exactly with Kern's. I do not think Kern is an EW'er of repute.

The bearish count, which I am on, is the Prechter count. W/r to the chart below, we had a 3 top in '79/'80. Following that we had a 5 wave A down, an a for an 'a', an abc for a 'b' (there is no other way to label that imo), and now possibly a 'c' up to complete the B of 4. The B thus is a '3' wave affair as it must be. Following a B of 4 top we need a complete 5 waver down, which would be a large C wave. Then we would have a complete ABC to complete a '4'. Gold need not go to a new low per this approach, but would probably hit 400 or a bit less, if this comes to pass.

I do not know for sure if Prechter is still on this count, but have every reason to believe he is.

I do presently suscribe to the more classical Ewave theory that an ending pattern of a 5 wave pattern must occur here, in some form.

There is a variant by another well known Ewaver that I know of. His variant is that the '4' will run (yes this other person has POG in a 4 also), and exceed the top of the '3' before retreating back a bit, but only a bit. The ending wave would still be a 5 waver of sorts. This is also a classical EW correction possibility. I will also state this other Ewaver says time is running out for the running variant. Gold has to break out within a week or maybe two, or it is probably curtains.

My chart read is much the same. Gold is pinned within a very tight area, of extreme important. If it goes up much further, it goes quite a ways. If it goes down much, it likely goes a long ways. Very tight here.



The short term GLD pattern per the Prechter approach is below. Although it has not been confirmed, this method would likely have POG in the early stages of a 3rd wave of C of 4 down.



I previously showed a complete Nem count, to nearly this date. There is no change there. I have never seen Nem and the HUI NOT form coincident major pivots. Here is the ST HUI count I have. This count would have the HUI nearing a B of [A] of 2 top, readying for a C of [A] of 2 down. C waves down in the HUI are not pleasant, for longs. It is thus behind NEM but on the same overall wave (presently).



A longer term chart of the GOX is here. Interpret for yerself. My interpretation is more bearish than boolish. This is the weekly. No mo here. Will it come? I dunno, but the pm indices live on mo, and higher gold prices.



Re the dollar, no I do not prefer to look at trade weighted indices. Just the regular indice. From an EW perspective the dollar is likely very near an ending pattern. An abc or a 5 waver, that started near the end of '05. The last wave down, a 5 waver starting in last qtr of '06, is a 'c' or a vth wave.

Not pushing anything to anyone here. Just what I see EW'wise. Just as likely wrong as right, but we are close to some major shift here. The air is getting tight in gold land. A BO or BD soon me thinks.

Decision Point monthly PMO has crossed over down on POG and the XAU.

I did look through all the HUI components the other day. Many more looked toppier than otherwise to me.

OTOH I will push another concept that I wished I had followed more or came across sooner. Related to a remark made the other day, about lack of synchronization. It is just lacking. With that in mind I am following several gold stocks that do not look toppy, but do not quite yet look like they are at lows. Very close however. Maybe some of yesterdays dogs. A couple look very explosive.

Hence in hindsight I wished I would have paid more attention to stocks on a more individual basis. At some point they will all come into synchronization. But it does not seem we are there yet. Right now I think it happens after 2010 and maybe even a bit beyond that. When it starts I think it will last for quite a number of years. Be rather unbelieveable more than likely.

And I am no longer short anything. Stopped out of my QID short last week. Should have done so earlier. USPIX looks like it is in a death dive. On a longer term chart it looks like it has broke down rather completely. It might well be in an ending pattern, but that ending pattern could take it to very low single digits (imo).




To: yard_man who wrote (8036)7/18/2007 1:29:52 AM
From: nspolar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
To demonstrate I am not pm bearish really, this is an example of a bullish gold stock, imo.

I have it as having done one hell of an impulse up for a [1], and now in a vth of C of 2 down. It would appear it has a few more months to go to me, whence it should be a great buy. There are others.

I really like some base metal plays here as well, a bit down the road. If the market keeps on pumping, select base metals are gonna rocket (imo).