SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (103365)7/18/2007 2:20:01 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
When Rumsfeld told the nation that we would begin the war in Iraq with a massive Baghdad bombing plan, dubbed Shock and Awe, whereby thousands of innocents died. Was this an act of terror? Does the term "shock and awe" equate to "terrorize"?

So will you agree with me that terrorism is condemnable in all occurrences, and agree to drop the 'relative' crapola?



To: one_less who wrote (103365)7/18/2007 2:32:12 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Yes i agree that all terrorism is condemnable. However i doubt that you do.

Do you condemn the groups i listed? The Zealots, The Sons of Liberty, Irgun, The Contras...

Was dropping a nuclear bomb on Nagasaki terrorism by your definition?

"A terrorist is a person who intends to harm innocents in order to bring a negative effect on his enemy."

SD