SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (103446)7/18/2007 10:06:36 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Respond to of 173976
 
no "cause and effect"?

A "decade long" depression just happened that way?
Bad policy did not contribute to it being a decade long?

Similarly, good policy did not contribute to the 2001
recession being "mild"? It just happened that way?



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (103446)7/18/2007 10:09:56 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Respond to of 173976
 
One could argue that June 1930 was the real beginning
of the Great Depression (signing of Smoot-Hawley tariff).

The market had actually recovered most of its losses
from late 1929 by early 1930.

theoptiontrader.com

theoptiontrader.com



To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (103446)7/18/2007 10:21:32 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Again, Reagan vs. GWB is not a fair comparison either
from the perspective of the stock market.

The market had been lackluster for over a decade
(late 1960's and the entire 1970's) before Reagan
took office.

GWB took office as the bubble was crashing.