Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: onepath who wrote (45289)	7/19/2007 10:35:37 PM
From: sageyrain	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

oops, well I guess I didn't read the original release close enough, that is pretty clear.

To: onepath who wrote (45289)	7/19/2007 10:41:31 PM
From: onepath	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

Did a scan of Cdn. PM mutual funds and the only fund down today is J. Embry's fund.(Sprott) Sure feel for Embry as it looks like he was caught bigtime.If he is hit with redemptions which is likely it will put further down pressure on SWG.Absolutely crappy timing for gold...just when it looks like a summer PM rally.

To: onepath who wrote (45289)	7/19/2007 11:43:23 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

We are still in a howbadizit mode. We don't know. Little Johnny Zhang not answering all the tough questions begins to look like he is planning a short helicopter flight. Will his widow get postcards from Brazil? Will be he be seen exiting 7-11's in Peoria? It will be quite denouement if it turns out that there was minor salting of a few holes, or a misreporting of results due to a mix up. But the way that Zhang is not answering... hmmm.. where was the chain of custody? The check sampling.. the independent company... What are these engineering companies good for? Hatch etc. what a bunch of stooges they are turning out it be. First Kilborn, now Hatch.. Even if nothing really bad is wrong, and we hope it isn't.. Hatch and other engineering firms will have to be held to new standards. It ain't a reportable assay unless you slept with the samples, had a camera on them 24-7 and the assay lab are all blind Mormons. No more of this horseshit. We don't need it. Unless there is serious chaing of custody for check samples, we should not invest at all. It should be up to the companies to provide some kind of oversight on this stuff. We need a ISO 20,000 on it. Soon. EC<:-}