To: E. T. who wrote (21223 ) 7/24/2007 12:32:45 AM From: Sully- Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588 Yawn. As long as one lib is willing to lie, other libs will swear to it. "[W]e cannot wait to act until the threat is imminent" Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz December 6, 2002 Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option. President George W Bush, State of the Union speech January 28, 2003 [The President] did not make a persuasive case that the threat is imminent and that war is the only alternative Senator Ted Kennedy - Immediately after the State of the Union address THE STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS; Bush Calls Iraq Imminent Threat Los Angeles Times January 29, 2003 Numerous Democrats, including Sens. Kennedy and John Kerry, originally opposed the resolution authorizing the use of force precisely because it wasn't hinged on an imminent threat... Sen. Robert Byrd (D., Va.) even offered an amendment requiring that imminence become the standard for war. After a debate, he lost. In other words, Kennedy & Co. objected to the war because Bush wouldn't say the threat was imminent and now they're peeved because Bush "lied" when he said the threat was imminent. http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/2003/10/20/news/editorial/7045984.htm A Brief History of The Imminent Threat Canard Message 19469610 Sorting out the "imminent threat" debateMessage 19508187 [H]ere you have it a nutshell. The administration was criticized before the war for not making a case that Iraq was an imminent threat, denied at that time that war was based on the supposition of an imminent threat, and was criticized after the war for having lied that Iraq was an imminent threat.