SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (344119)7/24/2007 12:43:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573433
 
CJ, > Which is the whole problem with the concept of a small, efficient government. It is much more prone to corruption, it even invites it.

You're kidding me. You just brought up the drug bill, which is an act of big government and as you say was heavily influenced by Big Pharma. Now you claim, as you have before, that a small efficient government is more prone to corruption?

A small, efficient government is still subject to the limitations on government imposed by the Bill of Rights and other laws designed to protect individual rights and freedoms. To argue for a big, inefficient government on the notion that it will be "less corrupt" is to take a great leap in logic.

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (344119)7/24/2007 1:11:17 PM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1573433
 
I suppose you think this is some sort of killer point, but darned if I can see what it is.

They have no killer point...hence the french poodle arguments.

Al