Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (237681)	7/24/2007 1:19:49 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

That makes two of us. I am offended at people who have so little notion of what the term "integrity" means that, who think it's perfectly okay to flip their stories for bribes from one of the most detestible tyrants of the 20th century, who no longer even have the decency of embarrassment or hypocrisy about it. You haven't even claimed once that Scott Ritter is a honest man who sincerely changed his story. All I hear from you is that he is "right" about no WMDs. Well Saddam who paid him made sure he was "right". Just like I hear now how the current NIE report is "right" but that anybody who believed the 2002 NIE report is a liar. Except the Democrats, who I am now told were "right" despite their public quotes to the contrary. It's an attitude that doesn't even know what internal consistency of an argument means. It does nothing but cherry pick facts for its current set of talking points. The talking points will be different tomorrow, so the facts will change retroactively. Again.