Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (237723)	7/24/2007 3:48:01 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

There is no ad hominem in this statement: You haven't even claimed once that Scott Ritter is a honest man who sincerely changed his story. All I hear from you is that he is "right" about no WMDs. Well Saddam who paid him made sure he was "right". No ad hominem here either Hint: the documents incriminating Galloway are the exact same ones incriminating your hero Scott Ritter: Both men were incriminated by the same list of paid Oil for Food bribes that was recovered from the Iraqi Oil Ministry in 2004. You don't even know how to tell an ad hominem argument. For you, it's any charge you don't like. That's not what it means. You don't like my calling Ritter your hero? Tough. I don't like to have this proven bribe-taker and alleged pedophile quoted to me as a credible source.