Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (45618)	7/25/2007 5:07:50 PM
From: LoneClone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

If I was writing this USA PR, I would report the silver in grams per ton, for two reasons: 1) many readers will just assume it is g/t unless they look very closely, because nobody ever reports numbers this big 2) a number over 2000 is a lot more attention-getting than 63. LC

To: loantech who wrote (45618)	7/25/2007 5:23:54 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

usa.v - '19.8 ft of 63.9 opt Ag', oh yeah that's pretty huge, lol, she'll rock tomorrow ... it's been looking set up recently anyway, narrowing in for a pennant pattern, i got my wife some last week and added quite a few for myself ... be nice to see silver uptick in the morning as well, and it might even do that, after this wicked little bullmarket retrace LC has a point there, how they should report in g/t, to keep standardised and also to dramatise the numbers, which are excellent ... looks as if they're trying to stay traditional to Silver Valley custom though ... 'when in Rome ... ' [of course in Rome you'd report in metric, period] 'Peñoles sees silver as high as usd15' - reuters.com ... got a doctor story, a nutrition story, and a reply for EC, but just got drafted to do stuff ... later