Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (344341)	7/25/2007 7:57:39 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573249

Z, > Even if you subtract from the overall US health care expenditures the amount of money towards health care that comes from individuals and businesses, the government's share of health care in the U.S. is higher per capita than that of any other country, which all have no money put in by individuals and businesses. So what's the point? Should we shift the share from individuals and businesses to government? Then hope that government can remove redundancies, force price controls, and lower the cost the way socialism would do it? You might succeed in reducing the cost of health care, but at a high cost to quality and productivity. Rich or poor, everyone then gets crappy health care. Which, of course, is the way socialists usually end up achieving "class equality." Tenchusatsu