Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (237884)	7/26/2007 1:37:17 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

But then he seemed not to have much really to go with - a few too many were launched Huh? Too many were launched? how does that show that he didn't have chemical warheads, as opposed to being deterred by the likely response to a chemical attack? It wasn't a really good test of whether he had nukes of not, but I decided that he probably didn't As was later discovered, his nuke program was a lot further along in 1991 than anyone had suspected. A few more hassle-free years would have done the trick. Then in the 1990s, he was hassled and inspected so much that I decided he really didn't have anything going. Hassling stopped in 1998 if you'll recall. Didn't start again until an American army was sitting on Saddam's doorstep in 2002. So why conclude he had nothing going in the meantime?