Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (237959)	7/26/2007 1:20:57 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"I think we need to have a will to go after the big organizations first, and poor labeling (imo) hinders that- because a lack of clarity in speech, leads the lack of clarity in action- and I would prefer to see clear action. Labels have never meant much to me except that falling under a label authorizes service. I don't see the two (AQ and AQ-lite) as mutually exclusive. For example, it was reported that Zarqawi split from OBL over some rift. Then when he had some successful operations in Iraq they began nuzzling again. I imagine the AQ-lites to be no different. If a separate group began to have some successful operations someplace in the world, the formal AQs would fund them as a model program for others to replicate. So, it seems reasonable to me that we take them all serious, managing our resources according to level of threat from each type of group without ignoring anyone.