Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (238049)	7/27/2007 1:15:48 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 281500

" It wasn't OBL's plan to have no followup for 9/11 for five, six years. " Was it OBL's plan to not follow up the '93 bombing until 2001, EIGHT YEARS later? Damn! Clinton did a WIZARD job of protecting us! Better than Bush, so far. Clinton didn't even have to start a pointless, ruinously expensive quagmire war so we could "fight them over there" and they wouldn't "follow us home"!

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (238049)	7/27/2007 1:15:52 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Which came first, 9/11 or Iraq? Good conflation as usual, Nadini. Just keep following the W PR campaign du jour, that's what you're good at. From the original WMD war marketing campaign, I thought summer was supposed to be the off season, but maybe desperate times call for desperate measures.