Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (20548)	7/28/2007 9:29:26 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220200

wrong, unless you take the initial as 6,000 years ago, and apex as 6,000 years from now, a less wrong point of departure and dot of arrival. Meaningless shifting of discussion and avoidance of real point with no logical or factual support. My point, and Futurist's, is that growth in a Third World country which is undergoing successful development is initially very strong, e.g., the South Korean example, but that it slows dramatically after a certain per capita GDP level is reached. You talk about 2015, about 6,000 years ago and 6K years hence, and are all over the map with absolutely nothing concrete to offer to support your 2015/6000 or whatever you might choose next. Focus, Jay, focus. Bullshit's easy. But worthless. As to nukes, well, you obviously speed-read the article if you read it at all since it is complex and nuanced and not at all supportive of your points. In other words, we're supposed to accept your mastery of complicated strategic issues, expressed in a few brief and content-free words, over those of experts. Whatever......but I know, I know, I can't handle the facts.