Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (237681)	7/30/2007 2:22:48 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Wiggle-wiggle. And yet Intel is rising strongly. And AMD has not put out a PR claiming Intel has admitted guilty behavior. And you still have no law degree. So put it all together.

To: combjelly who wrote (237681)	7/31/2007 2:35:27 PM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

As they say, "reasonable, stepped discounts" are fine. Everyone does them. What isn't fine is tying them to a percentage of the business Where does the Lepage case have the statement of law that discounts keyed to a percentage of the business? The Lepage case dealt with a bundled discount system and not a stepped discount system that Intel described. Bundled products included buy Scotch brand tape, PostIts, etc. and you will receive a discount on private label clear tape, e.g. Walmart brand tape.