SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lucretius who wrote (339377)7/30/2007 4:35:34 PM
From: hunchback  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Ok thanks...wake me up in another 5 years -g-



To: Lucretius who wrote (339377)7/31/2007 9:28:47 AM
From: Tommaso  Respond to of 436258
 
From Sowood Capital's letter yesterday to its clients. A sort of "Dear John" saying goodbye to their financial assets. The guy running this fund was the great genius hired for some time by Harvard, I believe, to manage their endowment:

During the month of June, our portfolio experienced losses mostly as a result of sharply
wider corporate credit spreads unaccompanied by any concomitant move in equities
and exacerbated by a marked decline in liquidity. This occurred over a broad range of
credit related instruments. In the first two weeks of July, spreads continued to widen,
and we experienced a loss similar to June. The weakness in corporate credit –
particularly focused on loans and loan credit default swaps – accelerated sharply during
the week of July 23. Until the end of last week these developments, while reducing the
value of our portfolio, were manageable. Our counterparties had not severely marked
down the value of the collateral that the funds had posted nor changed our margin
terms, and immediate liquidity needs could be met.
However, towards the end of last week, given the extreme market volatility, our
counterparties began to severely mark down the value of the collateral that had been
posted by the funds. In addition, liquidity became extremely limited for the credit
portion of our portfolio making it difficult to exit positions. We, therefore, reached the
conclusion over the weekend that, in the interest of preserving our investors’ capital,
the appropriate course of action was to sell the funds’ portfolio. We believe that the
arrangement with Citadel provided our best option under the circumstances, since we
were unable to find other sources of liquidity.
Conclusion
We are very sorry this has happened. We have always attempted to do the very best
for our investors. A loss of this magnitude in such a short period is as devastating to us
as it is to you. We are committed to acting in the best interests of the funds’ investors
and to keeping investors informed of decisions made in furtherance of this objective.
We sincerely appreciate your patience and understanding during this challenging period.



To: Lucretius who wrote (339377)7/31/2007 9:31:18 AM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Here's one of the monkeys. I was right.

thecrimson.com



To: Lucretius who wrote (339377)7/31/2007 1:58:22 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
don't be silly -- it is the year of the pig -- we already DID the monkey ...

lunarcollectorcoins.com