Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (237790)	7/31/2007 9:01:20 AM
From: j3pflynn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

SYH - News effect can be quick and strong, but it's not a physical law of the universe. And re: AMD stock price - According to you Intel boosters and AMD bears, AMD's price should be in mid single digits, so I'd say it's still in relatively the same ballpark in that context.

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (237790)	7/31/2007 12:19:42 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

"How about Intel will prosper, and AMD will wither slowly ? With this trend continuing for another 3 years." A dubious assertion at best. There is no way to know the competitive position of unreleased chips, much less the market conditions 1 year out, much less 3. Case in point. When the PIII was mature and the P4 was just being introduced, everyone thought that high power consumption was not a problem. So the BTX standard was conceived, cases with blowholes were developed and watercooling was thought to be the future for desktops. Intel, for example, made some investments in desktop watercooling solutions. There was talk of 150W, 180W and even 200W processors as being inevitable. It didn't work out that way. No one has the slightest clue what the competitive environment will be in 3 years.