SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (345135)7/31/2007 6:57:49 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578501
 
The Fathers were against Largess, they knew it would be used to buy votes. FDR changed that



To: goldworldnet who wrote (345135)7/31/2007 7:08:45 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1578501
 
re: The reasons for crime and poverty are endless, but our founders expected voting to be handled responsibly.

You are a real shithead, you know that? It would be interesting if you got some bad breaks and ended up in poverty... so you couldn't vote. A 'conflict of interest'.

What a clown... and you are tempting fate young man.



To: goldworldnet who wrote (345135)7/31/2007 10:57:31 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578501
 
"I believe welfare represents a conflict of interest when the recipient is a voter."

What about tax breaks? Aren't those a conflict of interest?



To: goldworldnet who wrote (345135)8/1/2007 8:16:31 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578501
 
I believe the right to vote by convicted felons should be forfeit and I believe welfare represents a conflict of interest when the recipient is a voter.

Hmmmm.....and a property owner doesn't have a conflict of interest when he votes against higher property taxes?