Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (345152)	8/1/2007 7:21:23 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573602

re: Did the NAACP give the same "jurisprudence" to the three Duke lacrosse players? The NAACP doesn't stand for the National Assoc for the Advancement of White College Boys.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (345152)	8/1/2007 8:25:32 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573602

Ted, > The NAACP is asking that Vick be given a fair trial and not be convicted in the court of public opinion before the trial has begun. I thought that was our system of jurisprudence. Do you disagree? Did the NAACP give the same "jurisprudence" to the three Duke lacrosse players? No. Were they supposed to? The last two initials in the NAACP stand for Colored People. I thought the Duke guys were wite. I saw yesterday that Vick's co-conspirator plead guilty as part of a plea-bargain deal with prosecutors. I guess they're all trying to corner the "big dog." Sure, innocent until proven guilty, but that won't stop dog owners like me from tossing doggy bags into a trash can lined with Vick's jersey ... ;-) If he's guilty, I hope they hang by his balls. He would be a pig in my book.