Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: smooth2o who wrote (237923)	7/31/2007 11:39:07 PM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 275872

s2o, Better check your facts, Joe, there was no fault found. It certainly was found in Japan case. But rather than contesting and going to trial, Intel chose to voluntarily skip that and jump straight to remedies. Intel doesn't need any tools except better products and better mfg as evidenced by the AMD -$1.2B loss this year so far. That has not always been the case. Of course not, didn't you read my post? If illegality can be proved, Intel should be punished for only those sales where they violated laws, not all sales... Each sale is different since there are different sales personnel involved. Intel will establish the anti-trust training and say there are some renegade salespersons. I think that would be Intel strategy. AMD strategy (or the other numerous commission dealing with Intel violations) would be to positively prove a few cases where evidence is available to make a determination, and extrapolate from that to the rest of the sales, where data is not available. Joe