SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (238535)8/1/2007 1:09:53 PM
From: c.hinton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
how is that treacherous?...he is merely pointing out that any plans for a timetable would have to be reconsidered if things where improving in iraq.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (238535)8/1/2007 3:36:29 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 281500
 
LOL -- no, treachery is pretending that we are on the right course when we are not. It is pretty widely understood that there is no military solution -- only a political solution. You show up with zero evidence of political progress and want to pretend that you can use the surge to justify your position if you can find any evidence that it is having an impact based on narrow military measures -- that is treachery.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News