Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (27563)	8/2/2007 9:56:23 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78628

HRPT. And then there's other ( negative)view of HRPT mentioned at the bottom of that article: "Our Motley Fool Income Investor advisor James Early has a different point of view on HRPT, recently advising subscribers to sell shares of the now-former recommendation. Find out why by signing up for a free 30-day trial. GlaxoSmithKline is a current Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation." And, as I find irritatingly typical of Motley Fool's writers, after his very, very positive viewpoint does the author actually have any money in the stock? Heck no! "Fool contributor Emil Lee is an analyst and a disciple of value investing. He doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned (in his article)." I have the feeling these fools are all twenty-something's with more brains than money. Sometimes with as much brains as money, i.e. none. -g-. Maybe they're mostly English majors a couple years out after graduation. I wish Tom Fool and the brother would pay their writers a decent wage so the authors (like Emil Lee who here claims to be a "disciple of value investing") could actually afford to invest in the stocks they seem to like so much in their articles. Or maybe these writers are all like lawyers: they're trained to take either side of any argument. Whoever pays them, that's the side they'll advocate. Will they invest in the stocks themselves on their positive write ups of them? Well, that's a big "likely not". end of rant.